<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.penton.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OH-OSHA Compliance</title>
    <link>http://www.occupationalhazards.com/zone/338/OHOSHA_Compliance.aspx</link>
    <description>www.occupationalhazards.com OSHA Compliance</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2009 Penton Media Inc.</copyright>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:29:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:29:14 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>PentonRSS\Utilities\RSSFormatter_Daily - tz v1.0</generator>
    <ttl>20</ttl>
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.penton.com/OHOshaCompliance" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
      <title>OSHA, Lockout/Tagout and General Motors: The Specificity Requirement of the Federal Lockout/Tagout Standard</title>
      <link>http://feeds.penton.com/~r/OHOshaCompliance/~3/PedbCPKBZ4U/ArticleDraw.aspx</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.OccupationalHazards.com/News/Article/79277/ArticleDraw.aspx</guid>
      <description>Attorney Michael T. Taylor analyzes a recent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission decision involving lockout/tagout at General Motors Corp. and the impact of the decision on workplaces.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:40:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.OccupationalHazards.com/News/Article/79277/ArticleDraw.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>What OSHA Expects: The Electrical Safety Questions OSHA Will Ask During an Investigation</title>
      <link>http://feeds.penton.com/~r/OHOshaCompliance/~3/cVJjHXKW1Fs/ArticleDraw.aspx</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.OccupationalHazards.com/News/Article/79112/ArticleDraw.aspx</guid>
      <description>When it comes to electrical safety, OSHA standards can be technical and confusing. What requirements do safety managers need to know?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 05:40:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.OccupationalHazards.com/News/Article/79112/ArticleDraw.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>OSHA 10-Hour Training Diary</title>
      <link>http://feeds.penton.com/~r/OHOshaCompliance/~3/3stfLnUK6zQ/ArticleDraw.aspx</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.OccupationalHazards.com/News/Article/79111/ArticleDraw.aspx</guid>
      <description>How difficult can the OSHA 10-hour training course be? I take it and report back on my experience &amp;#x2013; fall harness and all.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:40:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.OccupationalHazards.com/News/Article/79111/ArticleDraw.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>The Multi-Employer Doctrine: End of the Line or a Chance for a Fresh Start?</title>
      <link>http://feeds.penton.com/~r/OHOshaCompliance/~3/nHoWmugdPGE/ArticleDraw.aspx</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.OccupationalHazards.com/News/Article/67390/ArticleDraw.aspx</guid>
      <description>On April 27, the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission issued a decision that invalidates its long-standing doctrine that a general contractor on a construction site is responsible for supervising OSHA compliance by its subcontractors.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:41:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.OccupationalHazards.com/News/Article/67390/ArticleDraw.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Taking a closer look</title>
      <link>http://feeds.penton.com/~r/OHOshaCompliance/~3/IadRsk9pvms/ArticleDraw.aspx</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.OccupationalHazards.com/News/Article/66378/ArticleDraw.aspx</guid>
      <description>Are declining workplace injury and illness rates too good to be true?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 05:40:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.OccupationalHazards.com/News/Article/66378/ArticleDraw.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item>
  </channel>
</rss>
